Louisiana and Indiana Attorneys General Issue Guidance Saying Investment Firms That Incorporate ESG Factors Violate Their Fiduciary Duty – Corporate Governance

To print this article, all you need to do is be registered or log in to Mondaq.com.

Recently, the Attorney General of Louisiana and the Attorney General of Indiana issued legal guidelines that the consideration of ESG factors by investment firms would likely violate, in the absence of full disclosure, the fiduciary duty of these investment firms towards their investors. In other words, these attorneys general are effectively saying that if investment firms consider ESG factors when making investments – as many of the larger asset managers are beginning to do – then these investment firms investment would be subject to legal liability under state law.

It is the latest tactic being deployed by conservative politicians trying to counter the recent trend by corporate America – including some of the biggest and most important asset managers and investment firms – to demand that companies take into account ESG factors and provide information on the role of ESG issues in corporate decision-making. This represents a significant escalation from the last action taken by these two MAs (and seventeen other state-run MAs) when they announced a rating agency investigation into allegedly flawed ESG ratings. Such a strategy also exerts additional pressure beyond recent actions by state legislatures to compel state pension funds and similar public entities to boycott financial firms that supposedly use ESG factors to refrain from investing. invest in certain sectors. Now these attorneys general are virtually inviting plaintiffs to bring civil lawsuits against investment firms that consider ESG factors when making investments — when the firms fail to disclose that they do.

Notably, even though the efforts of these attorneys general are focused on state law enforcement, the guidance of these guidelines runs counter to recent federal rulemaking, including by the SEC, which seeks encourage additional consideration of ESG factors by company boards. . It is also possible that this issue could be addressed by the deployment of adequate disclosures by investment firms sufficient to satisfy applicable state law; however, it is likely that there would still be disputes over whether this disclosure regarding the use of ESG factors was indeed sufficient.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: US Corporate/Commercial Law

FinCEN geo-targeting orders

Taylor English Duma

FinCEN Geo-Targeting Orders (or “GTOs”) are specialized administrative orders issued by FinCEN pursuant to its authority under the Bank Secrecy Act.

US Compliance Enforcement

Debevoise & Plimpton

The aggressive law enforcement landscape in the United States has encouraged an increasing focus on corporate compliance programs. Businesses under U.S. jurisdiction can face significant consequences…